What it does
- Helps turn structured crash facts and notes into draft narrative language.
- Flags missing or unclear facts before review.
- Supports CR-3 training, coaching, and reviewer workflows.
Crash Narrative AI supports crash narrative drafting, missing-info review, CR-3 training, and reviewer workflows for Texas officers and deputies.
The same feature message is preserved, but users can scan it faster without a long vertical stack of cards.
Turns structured crash facts and officer notes into a clear draft narrative that can be reviewed, edited, copied, or exported.
Flags incomplete or unclear details such as location, unit actions, injury information, roadway conditions, evidence, or follow-up questions.
Supports fake/training scenarios with coaching-style feedback for officers, deputies, cadets, FTOs, reviewers, and instructors.
Provides Texas-focused CR-3 code guidance and contributing-factor review while reminding users to verify final decisions against policy.
Allows reviewer notes, status tracking, quality review, and report history for controlled beta and agency pilot testing.
Planned export workflow for copy-to-RMS, narrative text, PDF summaries, and structured data packages for future integration planning.
Version 3.0 will focus on controlled beta feedback using training/test data.
Is the draft useful? Does it save time? What fields are missing?
Would this help reduce report kickbacks or improve rookie training?
Does the tool ask the right follow-up questions?
Could training scenarios help teach better crash-report writing?
What security, policy, integration, or procurement concerns need to be addressed?
Important disclaimer: Crash Narrative AI does not replace officer judgment, supervisor review, TxDOT instructions, agency policy, or official CR-3 requirements. AI-generated output must be reviewed, verified, edited, and approved by the officer before any official use. Early beta testing should use fake, training, or sanitized data only.
Use this form structure for the live site when v3.0 is ready.